Publication and access
- arXiv, version 1, posted 2 October 2026 (cs.CV). Preprint; not peer reviewed.
- DOI · Version-specific source · Original PDF
- Roberta Hunt and August Easton-Calabria are marked as equal contributors in the PDF.
- License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0, confirmed on the arXiv record. The local PDF is an unmodified copy attributed to the authors above.
The abstract above is an editorial summary, not a verbatim author abstract.
Code and data
- Bumblebox annotation workflow
- BeeWhere models and annotations, CC BY 4.0 according to the Zenodo record. Check individual software licensing before reuse; public repository access alone is not a software license.
Relevancy to Gratheon
The annotation workflow and combination of body masks with readable tags are reusable methods for dense-colony video analysis. Unlike a tag-only detector, segmentation can represent body extent and detect bees whose identity is temporarily unavailable. The released annotations and models make the approach suitable for reproducible comparisons.
The experiments concern bumblebees in laboratory microcolonies, not honeybees at a field hive entrance. More detections do not imply reliable long-term identity: the paper reports identity switches and false identifications. Transfer to Apis mellifera, comb imagery or outdoor cameras needs independent validation. Section 3.1 describes video-level splits but also same-video frame spacing for segmentation; inspect the released split definitions before treating all results as video-disjoint. The pesticide analysis is exploratory, not a validated colony-health diagnostic.